Log inskip to content

August 2007
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031EC

Upcoming Events

  • No events.

Just as with the Y2K crisis of seven years ago, IT workers are being called upon to don superhero suits and save the enterprise from impending technology trouble. But this time, IT will be sifting through the complexities of the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Public Companies over 75 million already need to comply by 12/15/2007...

Will your SMB be Ready?


Calendar

August 2007
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Google
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

August 3rd, 2007

New Auditing Standard Will Save Public Companies Time and Money, According to Accounting Management Solutions

Following approval last week by the Securities and Exchange Commission of a new auditing standard aimed at increasing the accuracy of financial reports while reducing unnecessary audit costs, public companies should start planning their 2007 audits with provisions of the new standard in mind, according to Accounting Management Solutions, Inc.

The new auditing standard — known as Auditing Standard No. 5, or AS 5 — in combination with the commission’s new management guidance, will make Section 404 audits and management evaluations more risk-based and scalable to company size and complexity.

AS 5 is effective for integrated audits for fiscal years ending on or after Nov. 15, 2007. However, the SEC notes, earlier adoption is permitted and encouraged.

AS 5 replaces Auditing Standard No. 2 (An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements) and is intended to increase the likelihood that material weaknesses in internal controls will be discovered before they result in a material misstatement of a company’s financial statements, according to Greg Starr, AMS Middle Market Practice director.

He added that AS 5 aims to reduce unnecessary procedures and related costs, particularly for public companies with a market capitalization of $75 million or less.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AS 2 AND AS 5

According to Starr, the differences between AS 2 and AS 5 are significant and have a direct bearing on the content and execution of the entire audit, starting with the risk assessment. For example, he notes, under AS 5:

 

1) Management's risk assessment and principles-based judgment are
emphasized over the prescriptive auditor-focused approach under AS 2.
2) The risk analysis starts at the financial statement level and entity
level controls.
3) There is an increased emphasis on entity-level controls.
4) The objective is to opine on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting vs. opining on management's assessment of internal
control (AS 2).
5) AS 5 permits the auditor to place greater reliance on the work of
others.
6) There is an increased emphasis on fraud.

START WITH AN AS 5 RISK ASSESSMENT

When complying with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) for the current year, whether you are a first time non-accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, Starr advises companies to start with a risk assessment based on AS 5.

While SOX compliance is rarely viewed positively, it provides a great opportunity for companies to take advantage of AS 5 to enhance and fine tune their control environment, says Starr.

"Putting the appropriate time and effort upfront, and applying the right resources to develop a superior risk assessment will likely reap rewards now and well into the future by reducing SOX compliance costs and audit fees," he says.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>